The EBA publishes list of known issues to support reporting institutions
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has announced that it will publish a list of known issues on a regular basis related to the Reporting Framework. This list will include information on available workarounds and indicative timelines. The initiative is intended to improve transparency and support reporting institutions by providing a single reference point for recurring technical questions.
This publication forms part of the EBA’s broader simplification efforts to identify pragmatic ways to support the implementation of reporting requirements and reduce unnecessary operational burden, while preserving data quality and supervisory objectives. It also complements existing communication channels, including validation rule releases, taxonomy updates, and Q&A processes, and reflects the EBA’s continued commitment to supporting high-quality, consistent, and efficient supervisory and resolution reporting across the EU.
As a first step, the EBA is publishing a list of known issues affecting Pillar 3 Disclosures and Resolution planning reporting, as these frameworks have generated a particularly high volume of queries from institutions and national competent authorities. For each issue, the published file provides a brief description, the affected artefacts, the assessed severity, the current status, any available workaround, and the expected release in which the issue is planned to be resolved.
The list will be updated regularly and gradually extended to cover additional reporting and disclosure modules supported by the EBA DPM framework and XBRL taxonomy. Through this phased approach, the EBA aims to provide institutions with timely, clear, and practical information, while maintaining the stability of the reporting frameworks.
EBA 4.1 Pillar 3 Known issues
- Incorrect datatype in K_09.05 EU SEC 5 column 0020.
- Incorrect datatype in K_66.01.a EU CC1 column 0010 row 0830
- Incorrect datatype in K_71 EU LR2 row 0510 and K_61 EU-KM1 row 0260
- Incorrect datatype in K_02.00 EU-CCR1 column ”d. Alpha used for computing regulatory exposure value”
- Identical datapoints for VariableID: 3525577, 3525576 and 3526302.
- Incorrect datatype in K_00.02
- FINDIS validation in K_21.01 – EU CR1 vs. optional disclosure in K_83.01 – EU CQ4
- Mismatch between ITS disclosure option and taxonomy structure in K_28.00 – EU CR8
- ESG templates K_42.00 and K_45.00 counterparty scope
- Duplicate datapoint in template K_101.00
- Incorrect main property assignment in ESG templates D_05.00 and K_45.00
EBA 4.2 Resolution Known issues
- Identical cells Z03.01 r0100, c0010
- Z06.00 c0030: “Other” should be reported if a member is not listed, but there is no EBA Key for “Other”.
- Z13.00 c0060
- Z12.00 mapping from granular LDR sheets to aggregate LDR sheet
- Z02.00 items do not match
- Z01.02 key value on c0020 and c0050
- Typo in the picklist item, “a sown” should be corrected to “as own”
- Trailing space in picklist items should be removed.
- Consecutive spaces in picklist items should be reduced to one space
- There is no dedicated EBA key for the System type “Payment Systems” in Z09.01 c0040
- Z07.01.3 fields 0100 (Number of transactions) and 0110 (Number of clients)
- Z07.01.4 fields 0090 (Number of counterparties) and 0100 (Number of transactions)
- Z09.01 c0010 as a key value column
- Z_07.02/03/04/05; Z_08.01-5; Z11, Z12 Discrepancy between the taxonomy
- CFT -> Z07.01.02 -> Dropdown values
- Z09.01 Discrepancies FMI name
- Z09.02 c0040 is seen as a Key value.
- In Z_02.00.b cells are enabled while they should be greyed out
- Z08.01 – Z08.05 c0005 should be defined as alphanumeric
- Z08.04 c0040 “ID” should be Key
- The reporting of Key values in Z 07.01s
- Z09.01 Column 0110 should be left empty when the participation mode is “Direct
- Z09.03 Column 0020 should be only reported for CCPs